Human Rights Watch said Thursday it was worried that lawsuits meant to muzzle environmental advocacy groups were inhibiting free speech.

A lawsuit filed by Canadian logging company Resolute Forest Products against Greenpeace, Stand.earth and a handful of staff members uses the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act from 1970 in the U.S. courts. According to Human Rights Watch, the logging company accuses Greenpeace of generating revenue from misleading campaigns.

Matthew Parsons, a coordinator in the environmental division of Human Rights Watch, said the $230 million lawsuit by the logging company is an example of "strategic lawsuits against public participation," known also as SLAPPs.

"SLAPPs are meant to drain activists' resources and intimidate them into silence," he wrote. "When saddled with a multimillion-dollar lawsuit, organizations are forced to divert their attention away from their environmental work and to use scarce resources to defend themselves in court."

The U.S. division of Greenpeace was sued over its stance on the Dakota Access Pipeline. President Donald Trump in early 2017 gave final approval to finish the last stretch of the oil pipeline in North Dakota beneath Lake Oahe, a federally-owned body of water.

The Standing Rock Sioux Tribe filed a legal brief last year seeking a reversal of permits issued by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers for pipeline construction. North Dakota Gov. Doug Burgum, a Republican, said many of the project delays were politically driven.

Companies challenging the advocates argue their actions are causing significant financial harm.

In 2014, Spanish authorities seized a Greenpeace ship after activists staged a protest against Spanish oil company Repsol for its drilling operations near the Canary Islands. The Spanish government seized the vessel and started an investigation into the ship's crew for violation of maritime traffic rules.

In 2013, the Russian Foreign Ministry said action taken by Greenpeace "had the appearance of extremist activity." The advocacy group said it was working peacefully to raise concerns about the potential for an oil spill in the harsh arctic environment.

Human Rights Watch said it was concerned that some action, like SLAPPs, are aimed at muzzling environmental advocates.

"In the face of serious threats to our environment, such as biodiversity loss, climate change, and chemical pollution, it is critical for environmental activists and groups to be able to organize and freely express themselves without the threat of baseless lawsuits," Parsons wrote.

Related Links
All About Oil and Gas News at OilGasDaily.com

Tweet

Thanks for being here; We need your help. The SpaceDaily news network continues to grow but revenues have never been harder to maintain. With the rise of Ad Blockers, and Facebook - our traditional revenue sources via quality network advertising continues to decline. And unlike so many other news sites, we don't have a paywall - with those annoying usernames and passwords. Our news coverage takes time and effort to publish 365 days a year. If you find our news sites informative and useful then please consider becoming a regular supporter or for now make a one off contribution.
SpaceDaily Contributor $5 Billed Once credit card or paypal		SpaceDaily Monthly Supporter $5 Billed Monthly paypal only

Senegal's oil has good break-evens
Washington (UPI) May 30, 2018
There is a strategic interest emerging in oil from offshore Senegal, where a project can break even at $35 per barrel, the chairman of developer FAR Ltd. said. FAR is an Australian company, but has West African oil basins at the core of its portfolio. The company and its joint venture partners in March completed a geotechnical study of a 2,900 square mile permit area off the coast of Senegal that includes the flagship SNE oil discovery. The results revealed another 198 million barrels to the es ... read more