Medical and Hospital News  
Thompson Files: F-35 good value for U.S.

disclaimer: image is for illustration purposes only
by Loren B. Thompson
Arlington, Va. (UPI) May 4, 2009
When U.S. Defense Secretary Robert Gates "rebalanced" the Pentagon budget recently, he put the future of fighter aviation in the United States on the shoulders of the Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II Joint Strike Fighter.

The U.S. Navy will probably buy more Boeing F/A-18s, and the U.S. Congress may do right by the Air Force and fund 60 more Lockheed Martin/Boeing F-22 Raptors, but after that, it's all F-35. And the U.S. defense establishment in Washington probably won't be able to resist putting the mammoth program through an intense round of scrutiny. Can the Lockheed Martin F-35 deliver?

In the 1990s the Clinton administration scrapped several other new U.S. aircraft to pool money and research for a born-joint tactical aircraft program. Britain joined in, and later so did several other allied partners. The F-35 Lightning Joint Strike Fighter picked up innovations from the F-22 Raptor program, but it also cleared hurdles of its own, such as development of a revolutionary lift-fan engine for the short take-off and vertical landing version requested by the U.S. Marine Corps. The result was joint and global. Three close-cousin variants of F-35 will deliver to the Marines, allies, the U.S. Air Force and the U.S. Navy.

Three things stand out about the F-35 Lightning Joint Strike Fighter. First is its production line. In an era when U.S. manufacturing is under pressure, the F-35 line in Fort Worth, Texas, is one that will make you feel good about the United States. The line is a marvel of sophisticated automation, laser-guided assembly and precision tolerances. The F-35's exterior stealth materials are light years beyond previous coatings. They go on more evenly and are so durable that factory officials let visitors literally walk on samples of the radar-absorbing material.

Second, the F-35 Lightning is a good value. Yes, it will be expensive overall because of its sheer magnitude. What makes it a good value is its efficiency. Ramping up to production of more than 100 aircraft per year will create momentum and help keep unit costs in line. Third, the F-35 Lightning is a hard-power weapon but a soft-power partnership. Achieving true interoperability with the North Atlantic Treaty Organization and its member states and other allies will be doubly important as air forces shrink because of decreased defense spending.

However, a few clouds are gathering on the F-35 Lightning's horizon, of course. Intensive flight testing of the F-35 is getting under way, and flight tests usually do yield change orders. Expect the F-35 to have fewer changes than normal because so many of the systems have been pre-tested in labs or on other flying aircraft.

The bigger risk by far will come if the U.S. Department of Defense slows production or cuts the total buy. The so-called acceleration of the F-35 program briefed by Gates sped up parts of the test program but was dwarfed by the much bigger decision to cap peak yearly production for the U.S. Air Force at 80 F-35s per year, instead of the 110 per year budgeted by the service.

The Gates budget will actually leave the U.S. Air Force with almost 80 fewer F-35 Joint Strike Fighters in this five-year budget cycle. If this is a sign of more cuts to come, that's a problem.

Understand that the U.S. Air Force has no other advanced fighter, bomber or unmanned combat aircraft in development in the wake of the Gates decisions. On the Lockheed Martin F-35 Joint Strike Fighter program's broad shoulders rest significant hard- and soft-power options for the United States in the years to come.

(Loren B. Thompson is chief operating officer of the Lexington Institute, an Arlington, Va.-based think tank that supports democracy and the free market.)

Share This Article With Planet Earth
del.icio.usdel.icio.us DiggDigg RedditReddit
YahooMyWebYahooMyWeb GoogleGoogle FacebookFacebook



Related Links
The Military Industrial Complex at SpaceWar.com
Learn about the Superpowers of the 21st Century at SpaceWar.com



Memory Foam Mattress Review
Newsletters :: SpaceDaily :: SpaceWar :: TerraDaily :: Energy Daily
XML Feeds :: Space News :: Earth News :: War News :: Solar Energy News


Australia says military boost due to shifting dynamics
Melbourne, Australia (AFP) May 3, 2009
Australia's defence minister denied Sunday that the country was massively boosting military spending solely because of China's emergence as a global power.







  • Caltech Researchers Pinpoint The Mechanisms Of Self-Control In The Brain
  • In Britain, green squatters seize island
  • Tiny Genetic Differences Shed Light On The Big Picture Of Human History
  • Is There A Seat Of Wisdom In The Brain

  • Space missions focus on salmonella
  • Station Astronauts Lose Alarming Amounts Of Hipbone Strength
  • Station Astronauts Lose Alarming Amounts Of Hipbone Strength
  • Manipulating Salmonella In Spaceflight Curtails Infectiousness

  • War-scarred Angolan city reborn as university centre
  • Ivory Coast announces deployment of government/rebel force
  • Soldiers attack brother of Togo president: witnesses
  • Egypt knew about Sudan convoy strike at the time: FM

  • Six killed in avalanche in Austrian alps: rescuers
  • Mangroves Save Lives In Storms
  • Implementing Sustainable Technology To Monitor The Integrity Of Bridges
  • How Day-Planner For Astronauts Helps Firefighters

  • Mexico to end swine flu shutdown as epidemic wanes
  • Boredom and rice fill swine flu quarantine hotel
  • China denies discriminating against Mexicans
  • Mexico sees epidemic easing

  • Dolphins Maintain Round-The-Clock Visual Vigilance
  • Gray wolf withdrawn from US endangered list
  • Report Shows US Wildlife Trade Poorly Regulated
  • Preserved Proteins



  • Tree-Killing Hurricanes Could Contribute To Global Warming
  • 15 dead, 70,000 homeless in Brazil floods
  • Radar Engineers Aid Largest National Tornado Study
  • New Picture of Lake Tahoe's Earthquake Potential

  • The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2007 - SpaceDaily.AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA Portal Reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by SpaceDaily on any Web page published or hosted by SpaceDaily. Privacy Statement